Global cluster analysis and network visualization in organoids in cancer research: a scientometric mapping from 1991 to 2021.

Objective: In the last three decades, there has been a surge in research on cancer organoids using 3D culture technologies, which has resulted in the development of physiological human cancer models. This study aims to provide an overview of the global trends and frontiers in research on cancer organoids. Methods: A total of 3189 publications on organoids in cancer research from 1991 to 2021 were collected from the Science Citation Index-Expanded (SCIE) of Web of Science (WoS). Bibliometric methods such as the R package "Bibliometrix," Citespace, and VOS viewer software were employed to investigate and visualize bibliographic coupling, co-citation, co-authorship, and co-occurrence trends, as well as publication trends in the field of organoids in cancer research. Results: From 1991 to 2021, there has been a significant increase in publications on cancer organoids, with most articles being from North America, Eastern Asia, and Western Europe. The USA had the highest number of publications, citations, prolific authors, and research funding globally. Cancers was the journal with the most publications, while Nature had the best total link strength. Harvard University were the most contributive institutions. The global research in this field could be classified into five clusters: chemotherapy study, organoids for drug screening, different models, molecular mechanism study, and organoid construction. These areas are expected to remain hotspots for future research. Conclusions: The number of publications on organoids in cancer research is expected to increase based on current global trends.

Immunogenicity and safety of the quadrivalent inactivated split-virion influenza vaccine in populations aged ≥ 3 years: A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority clinical trial.

This study aimed to evaluate the immunogenicity non-inferiority and safety of the quadrivalent inactivated split-virion influenza vaccine in participants ≥ 3 years old. A total of 3,328 participants were enrolled. Participants 3-8 years old were administered one or two doses of the investigational vaccine or one dose of the control vaccine, whereas the other participants were administered only one dose of the investigational or control vaccine. The immunogenicity and occurrence of adverse events (AEs) after 30 days of full-course vaccination and serious adverse events (SAEs) within 6 months after full-course vaccination were assessed. The sero-conversion rates (SCRs) of anti-H1N1, H3N2, B(Y), and B(V) antibodies in the test group were 74.64%, 87.40%, 82.66%, and 78.89%, respectively, and their geometric mean titers were 1:250.13, 1:394.54, 1:200.84, and 1:94.91, respectively, which were non-inferior to those in the control group. The SCRs and sero-protection rates in the two-dose group of participants 3-8 years old were greater than those in the one-dose group. The incidences of total AEs and adverse reactions in the test group were 31.6% and 21.7%, respectively, which were close to those in the control group. In the two-dose group, the incidence of adverse reactions was considerably lower in the second dose (5.5%) than in the first dose (14.7%). Most AEs were grade 1 in severity, and no SAEs were recorded. The investigational vaccine had immunogenicity non-inferior to the control vaccine, and two doses were more effective than one dose in participants 3-8 years old, with a good overall safety.Trial registration: CTR20200715.

People in China are frequently infected by influenza viruses in specific seasons, causing a large burden of disease. Influenza viruses have distinct phenotypes depending on the season. Therefore, vaccines that can effectively prevent the infection of various influenza virus phenotypes need to be developed. The quadrivalent inactivated split-virion influenza vaccine is effective against four influenza virus phenotypes. In this trial, the immunogenicity and safety of the quadrivalent inactivated split-virion influenza vaccine (investigational vaccine) developed by Dalian Aleph Biomedical Co., Ltd. were evaluated. A total of 3,328 participants ≥ 3 years old were included. Participants 3­8 years old were further divided based on the presence or absence of a history of influenza vaccination. Those participants without a vaccination history were administered one or two doses of the investigational vaccine or one dose of a marketed quadrivalent influenza vaccine (control vaccine), and those participants with a vaccination history were administered one dose of the investigational or control vaccine. This study showed for the first time that the immunogenicity and safety of the investigational vaccine were not inferior to those of the control vaccine and that the two-dose procedure induced a good immune effect in the 3­8-year-old group. In conclusion, administration of the investigational vaccine can prevent seasonal influenza in populations aged ≥ 3 years.

Efficacy of programmed cell death 1 inhibitor maintenance therapy after combined treatment with programmed cell death 1 inhibitors and anti-CD19-chimeric antigen receptor T cells in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and high tumor burden.

We studied the efficacy and safety of the combined treatment with programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors and anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and subsequent PD-1 inhibitor maintenance treatment in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and high tumor burden. Forty-four R/R DLBCL patients with high tumor burden were enrolled in this study. The experimental group of 26 patients received combined therapy with PD-1 inhibitors and anti-CD19-CAR T cells, while the control group of 18 patients received anti-CD19-CAR T-cell therapy alone. The objective response rate (ORR) was 65.39% and 61.11% in the combination and control groups, respectively. The PD-1 inhibitor maintenance therapy was selected for patients who achieved complete response or partial response in the combination therapy group. Progression-free survival and overall survival rates in the combination group were higher than those in the control group 3 and 12 months after CAR T-cell infusion. There was no significant difference in the grade of cytokine release syndrome or immune effector cell associated neurotoxic syndrome between the two groups. In the maintenance therapy group, only eight patients experienced grade 1 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and three grade 2 CTCAE. Overall, we found that the ORR was not affected by the combination therapy with PD-1 inhibitors and anti-CD19-CAR T cells. However, patients who had achieved the ORR might benefit from PD-1 inhibitor maintenance therapy after combination therapy without increased side effects.

Efficacy of Humanized Anti-BCMA CAR T Cell Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients With and Without Extramedullary Disease.

In recent years, many new treatments for relapsed/refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM) have improved patient prognosis, but the prognosis of patients with extramedullary MM is still particularly poor. Therefore, more efficacious therapies and novel strategies are urgently needed for these patients. The aim of this study was to observe and compare the efficacy and safety of humanized anti-B cell maturation antigen (anti-BCMA) chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy in R/R MM patients with and without extramedullary disease. Seven R/R MM patients with extramedullary disease and 13 without extramedullary disease received humanized anti-BCMA CAR T cell therapy. The overall response rate was not different between patients with and without extramedullary disease. There was no difference in the progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) rates between the two groups at 180 days, but the PFS and OS rates in patients with extramedullary disease were lower at 360 days than those in patients without extramedullary disease. Although some patients with extramedullary disease experienced further disease progression, their M protein level did not increase. We did not see this change trend of M protein in patients without extramedullary disease. However, this was not observed in patients without extramedullary disease. Among patients who responded to CAR T cell therapy, the grades of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxic syndrome (ICANS) were much higher among patients with extramedullary disease. In summary, R/R MM patients with extramedullary disease could benefit from humanized anti-BCMA CAR T cell therapy in the short term, although the CRS and ICANS grades were much higher in patients with extramedullary disease. Therefore, anti-BCMA CAR T cell therapy allows for a remission time for R/R MM patients with extramedullary disease, which could be maintained by bridging hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, radiotherapy, and other therapies. Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx, identifiers ChiCTR1800017051 and ChiCTR2000033925.

Anti-CD22 CAR-T Cell Therapy as a Salvage Treatment in B Cell Malignancies Refractory or Relapsed After Anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy.

BACKGROUND: To observe efficacy of the anti-CD22 chimeric antigen receptor modified (anti-CD22-CAR) T cell salvage therapy in relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and B cell acute lymphoid leukemia (B-ALL) patients whose disease did not reach CR or progressed again after anti-CD19-CAR T cell therapy. METHODS: In our study, seven R/R DLBCL patients reached stable disease (SD) or progression of disease (PD) after their anti-CD19-CAR T cell therapy. Only three in all the six R/R B-ALL patients obtained complete response (CR)/CR with incomplete count recovery (Cri) in their anti-CD19-CAR T cell therapy, but they relapsed again in the following three, six and one months. Then, all these thirteen R/R DLBCL and B-ALL patients received anti-CD22 CAR-T cell salvage therapy because their disease did not reach CR or progressed again. RESULTS: Four R/R DLBCL patients obtained CR, while two R/R DLBCL patients achieved PR and one patient achieved SD. But only two R/R B-ALL patients obtained Cri in their anti-CD22 CAR-T cell salvage therapy. The overall survival (OS) of R/R DLBCL patients after the anti-CD22 CAR-T cell therapy was 6.142±3.395 months until August 31, 2020. There was no different of the median expansion peaks of the two kinds of CAR T cells (P=0.920). The time of anti-CD22-CAR T cell proportion peak days was later than that of the time of anti-CD19-CAR T cell peak days post infusion (P=0.022). Their cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was graded 2-4 in their anti-CD19-CAR T cell therapy, while the notable CRS was graded 1-2 in their anti-CD22-CAR T cell therapy. But there was no difference in the CRS and the immune effect or cell associated neurotoxic syndrome (ICANS) grades in the two kinds of therapies. And there was no difference in the hematological toxicity grades in the two kinds of therapies. CONCLUSION: The anti-CD22-CAR T cell salvage therapy is highly effective in R/R DLBCL patients than in R/R B-ALL patients who failed in anti-CD19-CAR T cell therapy before. We need to expand the number of R/R DLBCL or B-ALL patients and continue to observe. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR-ONN-16009862 and ChiCTR1800019298.

Ibrutinib improves the efficacy of anti-CD19-CAR T-cell therapy in patients with refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

The efficacy and side effects of the second-time humanized CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CD19-CAR) T-cell therapy after unsuccessful first-time anti-CD19-CAR T-cell therapy and subsequent ibrutinib salvage treatment were observed in patients with refractory B-cell lymphoma. In our study, 3 patients with refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and 4 patients with refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) reached stable disease (SD), partial remission (PR), or progression of disease (PD) after first-time humanized anti-CD19-CAR T-cell therapy. They received ibrutinib as a salvage treatment and kept an SD in the following 7-16 mo, but their disease progressed again during ibrutinib salvage treatment. All 7 patients received a second-time humanized anti-CD19-CAR T-cell therapy, which was the same as their first-time anti-CD19-CAR T-cell therapy. In total, 3 MCL patients and 3 FL patients reached complete response (CR) with the second-time anti-CD19-CAR T-cell therapy combined with ibrutinib, whereas 1 FL patient reached PR. There were no differences in the transduction efficiency and proliferation between the 2 instances of anti-CD19-CAR T-cell therapy. However, the second-time anti-CD19-CAR T-cell therapy led to higher peaks of anti-CD19-CAR T cells and anti-CD19-CAR gene copies, but also to higher grades of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and more serious hematological toxicity. The successful outcome of the second-time anti-CD19-CAR T-cell therapy might suggest that the previous ibrutinib treatment improved the activities of anti-CD19-CAR T cells.